Rate and Find Scandals

Rate and review scandals based on your experiences

Explore by Category

Frequently Asked Questions

Got questions? We've got answers. Delve into our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) section to find comprehensive information about your inquiries.

EmbassyScandal.com is an independent investigative platform that documents and analyses alleged scandals, misconduct, and abuses of power involving embassies, diplomatic missions, and diplomatic personnel worldwide, in the public interest.

The platform covers a broad range of embassy-related issues, including:

  • Visa and consular scandals

  • Diplomatic corruption and misconduct

  • Abuse of diplomatic immunity

  • Financial crimes and embezzlement

  • Political interference and influence operations

  • Human rights violations

  • Organised or systemic embassy corruption

  • Cover-ups, obstruction, and retaliation

No.

Unless clearly stated, content published on EmbassyScandal.com relates to allegations, investigations, or documented claims. The platform does not determine guilt and does not replace courts, prosecutors, or judicial authorities.

Verification may include:

  • Reviewing documents and official correspondence

  • Corroborating testimony from multiple sources

  • Analysing patterns across similar cases

  • Consulting publicly available legal or administrative records

All content is subject to editorial review prior to publication.

Submissions may be made by:

  • Individuals affected by embassy actions

  • Whistle-blowers

  • Journalists and researchers

  • Lawyers or legal representatives

  • Civil society or human-rights organisations

Submission does not guarantee publication.

Yes.

Anonymous and confidential submissions are accepted where necessary to protect individuals from retaliation, subject to editorial and legal assessment.

No.

The platform is non-partisan and independent. It does not support or oppose any government, embassy, political party, or ideological position.


To ensure responsible reporting:

  • Allegations are clearly identified as such

  • Neutral and factual language is used

  • Evidence is referenced where possible

  • Right-of-reply is respected

  • Corrections are made when warranted